“The
competitive habit of mind easily invades regions to which it does not
belong. Take, for example, the
question of reading. There are two
motives for reading a book: one, that you enjoy it; the other, that you can
boast about it. It has become the
thing in America for [readers] to read (or seem to read) certain books every
month; some read them, some read the first chapter, some read the reviews, but
all have these books on their tables.
They do not, however, read any old masterpieces…Consequently the reading
that is done is entirely of modern books, which, of course are seldom and never
of masterpieces. This also is an
effect of competition, not perhaps wholly bad, since most of the [readers] in
question, if left to themselves, so far from reading masterpieces, would read
books even worse than those selected for them by their literary pastors and
masters.”
The Conquest of Happiness
In
his book, The Conquest of Happiness, Bertrand
Russell outlines what he sees as the causes of unhappiness and, ultimately,
those of happiness. Russell’s
philosophy provides a context through which, and against which, I will pose my
project and “hypothesis,” if you will.
I strive to amplify Russell’s point that “men and women appear to have
become incapable of enjoying the more intellectual pleasures” and this is a
principal, but certainly not solitary, cause of unhappiness. When pressed, which is to say, when
under the threat of torture, I would have to admit that both being happy and
reading place in the top five on MYLISTOFTHINGSGRAETSAECREDANDSAEXY.
Russell,
in developing his argument, advises the deconstruction of moral codes and
social norms imparted to the unhappy-man during his childhood: the dissolution
of imagined structures to the world.
This is where my process divorces Russell’s. I strive to bring us back to the structured comfort we all once
knew and all still secretly love.
We will be read a children’s book via tape recoding; we will turn the
pages when prompted by the ding; we will read along and not skip ahead; we will
learn ourselves how to read.
Hopefully this will reconstruct a part of our past in which we first saw
that we could read, even when someone had not told us to. Reading with integrity, we’ll call
it.
Unfortunately,
due to foreseen budget cuts, the number of books provided will force the
children to share one copy between two, or three of his or her classmates. Children of lower reading aptitudes
needn’t worry. Mr. Jameson will be
there to help you sound out any three-syllable, or tough two-syllable,
words. There will be no talking
while the tape recording of the book is being played. If there is time, children may ask questions after the book
has finished, but only questions pertaining to the book the student has just read. We will learn something, be reminded
why reading really is valuable, cause after all, “What good could such knowledge
be? It could not add to anybody’s
income.”
Citation can be provided if needed
Tucker - Excellent! I am seeing so many ways to enhance this experience - perhaps you don a specific Mr. Rogers-esque costume, or pass toys around the classroom? Or perhaps, to drive your point home about how adulthood has changed reading to be more about cultivating an image than it is about acquiring knowledge, you can juxtapose the childlike experience with media that depicts the pretentiousness of adult academics eager to impress one another?
ReplyDelete